.png)
Lemon Law and Australian Consumer Law: A Practical Overview
Tailored Contract Law Services
Results Focused
Transparent Pricing
Lemon Law and Australian Consumer Law: A Practical Overview
Australia does not have a formal statute titled "Lemon Law." However, the consumer protections often associated with that term, particularly relating to defective motor vehicles, are embedded within the Australian Consumer Law (ACL), which is set out in Schedule 2 to the Competition and Consumer Act 2010 (Cth).
​
Under the ACL, consumers are entitled to remedies when a vehicle fails to meet acceptable quality standards, including guarantees as to performance, durability, and fitness for purpose. These protections apply regardless of whether a vehicle is new or used and are enforceable against both suppliers and manufacturers.
​
For the purpose of this article, the term "Lemon Law" will be used interchangeably to refer to the relevant consumer guarantees and protections provided under the ACL as they apply to defective motor vehicles.
​
This article, provides a practical overview of these protections. It explores how they function in real-world scenarios and outlines the steps consumers can take when faced with a lemon vehicle.
Understand the Basics of Lemon Law in Australia
Lemon Law offers specific consumer protections for buyers who encounter vehicles that fail to be of acceptable quality, fit for purpose, and/or correspond with their description or demonstration.
Define Lemon Law and Its Application for Consumers
Under the Australian Consumer Law, consumers may seek remedies when a motor vehicle fails to meet the statutory guarantees of acceptable quality, fitness for purpose, or correspond with their description and/or demonstration. This includes situations where a major failure occurs (such as serious defects in the engine, transmission, or other critical systems) or where the same problem recurs despite multiple repair attempts. In such cases, consumers may be entitled to a replacement vehicle, a full refund, repair, and/or compensation, depending on the nature and severity of the failure. These protections ensure that consumers are not left with defective vehicles and help maintain accountability across manufacturers and suppliers.
Explore Key Legal Principles of Lemon Law (as Reflected in Australian Consumer Law
A major failure occurs when:
​
-
The vehicle has a major defect (e.g., engine or transmission failure) that would have deterred a reasonable consumer from purchasing it had they known about it.
-
The vehicle is significantly different from the description or demonstration provided before sale.
-
The defect renders the vehicle unsafe, unusable, or unrepairable within a reasonable time.
-
The vehicle cannot be remedied without significant inconvenience to the consumer.
​
Separately, where a defect is not a major failure, consumers still have the right to reject the vehicle if:
​
-
The same defect recurs after multiple reasonable repair attempts.
-
The supplier fails to repair the defect within a reasonable time after being requested to do so.
In both cases, the consumer may be entitled to reject the vehicle and seek a refund, replacement, or compensation.
​
These principles reflect the ACL’s commitment to fairness and accountability, ensuring that consumers are not left with vehicles that fail to meet acceptable quality standards. They also compel manufacturers and suppliers to take responsibility for recurring issues and act promptly to remedy them, reinforcing consumer trust and legal compliance.
Key Legal Remedies Available to Consumers
Depending on the nature of the defect, and/or the failure to comply with the statutory consumer guarantees and how the supplier responds to the consumer's notices and requests, consumers may be entitled to:
​
-
A full refund of the purchase price for the vehicle; or
-
A replacement vehicle of the same make and similiar value; or
-
Repairs to remedy the defect at no costs to the consumers; and
-
Compensation for associated losses, such as, but not limited to, towing, hire car fees and alternate transport and interest payments.
​
These remedies aim to restore the consumer to the position they would have been in had the statutory guarantee not been contravened.
The Importance of Documentation in Vehicle Defect Claims
Strong documentation is essential when pursuing a remedy under the ACL. Consumers should retain:
-
All repair invoices, service reports and diagnostic records;
-
Correspondence with the dealer or manufacturer;
-
Photographic or video evidence of recurring issues;
-
The contract of sale and warranty documents.
This evidence forms the foundation of any claim and demonstrates that reasonable steps were taken to seek a remedy.
Steps to Take if You've Purchased a Lemon Vehicle
If you believe your vehicle is defective and is a lemon vehicle, it is important to act promptly and follow the correct procedures to preserve your rights under the ACL. Whether the issue constitutes a major failure or a problem that has not been resolved despite multiple repair attempts, the following steps will guide you through the process of asserting your rights.
Step 1: Identify Whether the Issue Constitutes a Major Failure
You may be entitled to reject the vehicle and seek a refund or replacement if the issue:
-
Renders the vehicle unusable, unsafe, or unfit for purpose;
-
Means the vehicle is materially different from what was described or demonstrated before sale;
-
Is not capable of being remedied within a reasonable time;
-
Would have deterred a reasonable consumer from purchasing the vehicle had they known about the defect.
Further to the above, where a defect is not a major failure but the supplier fails to repair it within a reasonable time, the consumer may still have the right to reject the vehicle under the ACL. In such cases, even though the defect alone may not substantially impair the vehicle’s use, value, or safety, the failure to provide a timely remedy may entitle the consumer to seek a refund or replacement
​
Separately, if a vehicle develops multiple minor defects, these may collectively amount to a major failure if they have the cumulative effect of making the vehicle not of acceptable quality, unfit for purpose, unsafe, or significantly different from what was represented prior to sale. In those circumstances, the consumer would be entitled to reject the vehicle on the basis of a major failure.
Step 2: Take Prompt Action to Reject the Vehicle
Under the ACL, a consumer has the right to reject goods that have a major failure, but this right is subject to a rejection period. This period is not fixed in legislation but must be reasonable in all the circumstances, including the type of goods, the nature of the defect, and how long it would typically take for a defect to become apparent.
​
Once a consumer becomes reasonably aware that a major failure has occurred, or the consumer has a right to reject the lemon vehicle, it is critical to act without undue delay. Delaying too long may affect your right to reject the vehicle.
Step 3: Send a Written Notice of Rejection
To formally reject the vehicle, you should notify both the supplier (usually the dealer) and, where applicable, the manufacturer. This can be done via email or letter, and should:
​
-
Clearly state that you are rejecting the vehicle;
-
Set out the basis of your rejection, including reference to the major failure or repeated failed repairs;
-
Request a specific remedy (e.g., refund or replacement) in accordance with your rights under the ACL.
This written notice will create a clear record of your rejection and the reasons for it.
​
To ensure your position is clearly articulated and all aspects of your claim are properly addressed, including any damages or losses suffered as a result of the failure to comply with the statutory guarantees, you should contact Arida Lawyers for assistance. Our team can help you prepare a well-structured letter of demand and rejection that outlines the legal basis of your claim, documents supporting evidence, and seeks appropriate remedies under the ACL.
Step 4: Retain All Documentation
You should retain copies of:
​
-
Your rejection notice (email or letter);
-
Repair invoices and service records;
-
Warranty documents;
-
Correspondence with the dealer and/or manufacturer;
-
Photographs or videos of the defect, if applicable.
This documentation will support your claim should the matter need to proceed to mediation, tribunal, or court proceedings.
Step 5: Seek Legal Advice
If the supplier or manufacturer refuses to concede to your rejection, disputes your claim, or fails to respond within a reasonable time, it is important to seek legal advice to protect your position and enforce your rights.
You can contact Arida Lawyers to arrange a 10-minute, no-obligation telephone consultation. Our team can assist you in preparing a properly worded letter of demand and rejection that clearly outlines the legal basis of your claim under the Australian Consumer Law. We will also ensure that any losses or damages you’ve suffered, such as repair costs, towing, or loss of use, are accurately captured in your demands.
​
In addition, we can represent you in pre-litigation negotiations with the dealership and manufacturer to help resolve the matter without the need for formal proceedings. If the issue remains unresolved, we can assist with preparing and lodging your application to the NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal (NCAT), which has jurisdiction over motor vehicle consumer disputes in New South Wales (up to $100,000), or provide legal representation from the time of filing through to the hearing, ensuring your case is properly presented and your interests are protected at every stage. If your claim exceeds $100,000, we can also provide legal assistance and advice in courts of higher jurisdiction.
Frequently Asked Questions
Q: Does Australia have a Lemon Law?
A: Not formally. However, the Australian Consumer Law provides similar protections for consumers who purchase lemon vehicles, including the right to reject the defective vehicle in cases of major failure or repeated repair issues.
​
Q: What is considered a major failure under the ACL?
A: A major failure includes serious defects that render the vehicle unsafe, unfit for purpose, or significantly different from what was described. Examples include engine or transmission failures that cannot be fixed within a reasonable time.
​
Q: Can I reject a vehicle if the same problem keeps recurring?
A: Yes. Even if a single issue isn’t a major failure, if it persists after multiple unsuccessful repair attempts or isn’t fixed within a reasonable time, you may still have the right to reject the vehicle
​
Q: What if my vehicle has several minor problems, not one big issue?
A: Multiple minor defects can collectively amount to a major failure.
​
Q: How do I formally reject a vehicle?
A: You must send a written notice (typically via email or letter) to the supplier and, where applicable, the manufacturer. It should state that you are rejecting the vehicle, outline the basis of the rejection, and request a remedy such as a refund or replacement.
​
Q: Can Arida Lawyers help with writing the rejection letter?
A: Yes. We can prepare a properly drafted letter of demand and rejection, clearly setting out your legal position and ensuring any damages or losses are fully captured.
​
Q: What is NCAT and when can I apply there?
A: NCAT (NSW Civil and Administrative Tribunal) handles consumer claims up to $100,000. Arida Lawyers can assist with preparing the application and provide legal representation from filing through to the hearing.
​
Q: What if my claim exceeds $100,000?
A: We also assist clients in pursuing motor vehicle defect claims in other courts where the claim amount exceeds $100,000.
​
Q: How do I get started?
A: Contact Arida Lawyers today to arrange a 10-minute, no-obligation telephone consultation. We’ll assess your situation and explain how we can help.